At 43, Prince William Finally Breaks Silence On His Mum Diana’s Tr:agic D.ea/th and Admits What We All Suspected
Andy Webb, author of Dianarama, tells how the late Princess Dianaâs fateful BBC Panorama interview changed the course of history
t was the soul-baring interview that changed the course of her life. Sitting in front of a TV camera 30 years ago, Diana, Princess of Wales, told the world that there were three people in her marriage.
At the time, Dianaâs appearance on Panorama, the BBCâs foremost current affairs show, was regarded as a scoop for reporter Martin Bashir. But later it emerged that he had used forged documents to trick her into taking part. Now the journalist who helped to uncover the scandal tells HELLO! how he spent 20 years fighting for the truth, helped by Dianaâs brother, Earl Spencer.
âI really do think that itâs an important story, particularly when you look at the effects on Dianaâs family, on Prince William and on Charles Spencer,â says Andy Webb, author of Dianarama: The Betrayal of Princess Diana. âI always try to stand back from the fact that these are royals, because they are real people.â
Deceitful methods
The book details the deceitful methods used by Bashir to secure the interview, which was broadcast on 20 November 1995.

Diana being interviewed at Kensington Palace
âI think, of late, William is really showing us that heâs somebody who knows his own mind. Heâs not afraid and he knows right from wrong,â says Andy. âHeâs determined to discover exactly what happened back in the day, as he doesnât feel the official inquiry has provided sufficient answers.â He is referring to the independent investigation 25 years later led by Lord Dyson into how the interview was obtained. âItâS an open wound, and [William] has people on the case to help discover exactly what happened.â
âWilliam is determined to find out exactly what happenedâ
Four years ago, William said that it brought him âindescribable sadnessâ that the BBCâs failures to tell Diana the truth once they discovered Bashirâs dishonesty âcontributed significantly to her fear, paranoia and isolation that I remember from her final yearsâ.

Prince William is determined to find out the truth
Bashir told Diana that William â then only 13 years old â had been given a watch by his father containing a recording device to eavesdrop on her. Bashir also claimed that Prince Charles, as he was then, was in love with the childrenâs nanny, Tiggy Legge-Bourke, and that Dianaâs trusted private secretary, Patrick Jephson, was being paid to spy on her â a claim he backed up with forged bank statements.
HeartbreakingÂ
âWhen William became aware of the absolute scale and complexity of the duplicity, that must have been heartbreaking for him, because he began to realise the enormous pressures that his mum had been placed under,â Andy says.

Diana with her sons, Princes William and Harry
âIâm sure William feels just as you or I would feel if we realised that a con man had got into our motherâs house. In many ways, Martin Bashir isnât the critical character in this. The key moment, when that runaway train could and should have been halted, occurred about six months later [when the BBC first became aware of the forgery]. But she was a victim of her own celebrity, and the story was too big to fail.â
âShe was a victim of her own celebrityâ
While researching his book, Andy â a former BBC reporter for shows including Watchdog â won the trust of Earl Spencer, who told him he believed there was a link between the interview and Dianaâs death in Paris two years later. Diana died with her boyfriend, Dodi Fayed, in a car driven by Dodiâs father Mohamed Al-Fayedâs chauffeur.
Tragic outcome
âThere is a line that can be drawn between Panorama and Paris,â says Andy. âBecause of the falsehoods Diana had been told, she pushed aside people she no longer trusted, like Patrick Jephson, who had been that protective voice of wisdom. âA month after that interview, Diana got a letter from the Queen saying it was time to get divorced, and before long she finds herself in Paris.

Diana in May 1997 â months before her tragic death
âIn the same way that we all know what happened to Anne Boleyn 500 years ago, in 500 yearsâ time people will be discussing the conspiracy that brought down Diana.
âPlaywrights, novelists and filmmakers will come back to it again and again, just like Hilary Mantel did with Wolf Hall. Itâs like a Shakespearean plot â youâve got a beautiful princess, a faithless husband and a weaselly character, whispering all these falsehoods in her ear, and it ends in tragedy.â





